Get all the data you need about the real estate market in Argentina
SUMMARY
Who qualifies for Argentina’s new property tax break? Today, the strongest beneficiaries are individuals and undivided estates that rent homes used as genuine permanent residences, together with individuals selling qualifying Argentine property outside a real-estate trading business.
The reform is broader than a typical small-landlord incentive. An individual can own several apartments and potentially exempt the rental income from every one of them, as long as each property passes the permanent-home test.
The biggest dividing line is not the number of properties owned but how each property is used. Six conventional residential rentals can fit the exemption more comfortably than one Airbnb-style tourist apartment.
The tenant now matters unusually much to the landlord’s tax position. Decree 406 requires the property to be the occupant’s unique, family and permanent home, which can make eligibility depend on circumstances that an owner may struggle to verify.
Companies are in a considerably weaker position. The law itself did not clearly restrict the rental exemption to individuals, but Decree 406 does, and Argentine tax specialists are already questioning whether the government narrowed the legislation too far.
Corporate housing creates another grey area. An apartment occupied permanently by an employee looks economically like residential housing, yet a lease signed by the employer is harder to reconcile with a rule referring to the tenant’s own family home.
Property sales have become surprisingly favorable for ordinary individual investors. Argentina first abolished the old 1.5% ITI transfer tax and has now exempted qualifying individual gains that could previously fall under the 15% Article 99 regime.
That does not turn property dealing into a tax-free business. Repeated development, flipping or organized trading can still fall under business-income rules even when an individual rather than a company holds the assets.
The exemption also applies to eligible income from leases signed before the reform. Argentina therefore changed the tax treatment of part of the existing rental stock rather than limiting the benefit to newly signed contracts.
The cash value varies enormously from one owner to another. A landlord whose rental profit would otherwise fall near the top of Argentina’s progressive Income Tax scale can save substantially more than someone who was already paying little Income Tax.
And the property itself is certainly not “tax-free.” Provincial Gross Income Tax, city or provincial property charges, Personal Assets Tax, registration requirements and rental invoicing can all continue even when national Income Tax disappears.
Overall, the new regime is genuinely generous for ordinary individual residential investors, but much less forgiving once the facts move toward tourism, corporate ownership, corporate housing or professional property trading.
Thinking of buying real estate in Argentina?
Acquiring property in a different country is a complex task. Don't fall into common traps – grab our guide and make better decisions.
What is Argentina’s new property tax break actually giving owners?
Argentina’s new property tax break currently removes national Income Tax from qualifying residential rent and certain property-sale gains; it does not wipe out the taxes people pay simply for owning real estate.
That distinction clears up much of the confusion around the reform. Article 192 of Law 27,802 changed the Income Tax Law, and Decree 406/2026 later explained how the new exemptions work. The two big benefits concern rental income from homes used as a tenant’s permanent residence and gains from certain sales of Argentine property by individuals and undivided estates.
Local property taxes continue. An owner in Buenos Aires City can still face Inmobiliario and ABL charges. Provincial real-estate taxes continue under provincial law. Personal Assets Tax follows its own rules, and rental activity can still create provincial Gross Income Tax obligations.
So when people talk about Argentina’s “new property tax break” today, the useful question is who can stop paying national Income Tax on residential rent or on a qualifying property sale.
| Tax or charge | Government level | What happens now? | Who sets the rules? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income Tax on qualifying residential rent | National | Exempt for qualifying cases | National government / ARCA |
| Income Tax on qualifying property-sale gains | National | Exempt for qualifying cases | National government / ARCA |
| Inmobiliario / ABL in Buenos Aires City | City | Still applies | AGIP |
| Provincial property tax | Provincial | Still applies | Provincial tax authority |
| Personal Assets Tax | National | Separate regime continues | ARCA |
| Gross Income Tax on rentals | Provincial | Can still apply | Provincial tax authority |
Who qualifies for Argentina’s new residential rental tax exemption?
Individuals and undivided estates are the clearest beneficiaries of Argentina’s residential rental exemption today, provided the property is genuinely used as the tenant’s permanent home.
Decree 406 says the exemption covers personas humanas and sucesiones indivisas acting as landlords or sublandlords. More importantly, it ties the benefit to the way the tenant uses the property.
The decree defines a qualifying casa-habitación as the occupant’s unique, family and permanent dwelling. For a rental, we therefore look at the tenant’s home rather than the landlord’s own residence.
An individual renting an apartment to a family that lives there permanently fits the rule cleanly. So does an undivided estate receiving rent from a qualifying home while an inheritance is still being settled.
There is no requirement that the landlord own only one property. That makes the reform much broader than a typical small-landlord incentive.
| Owner and use | Current position | Main reason |
|---|---|---|
| Individual renting a permanent home | Qualifies | Core case covered by Decree 406 |
| Individual renting several permanent homes | Qualifies | No portfolio-size ceiling |
| Undivided estate renting a permanent home | Qualifies | Expressly included |
| Individual renting a tourist apartment | Usually does not qualify | Permanent-home test fails |
| Company renting apartments | Disputed, but decree excludes it | Regulation refers to individuals and estates |
| Individual renting commercial premises | Does not qualify | Property is not used as a home |
Don't buy the wrong property, in the wrong area of Argentina
Buying real estate is a significant investment. Don't rely solely on your intuition. Gather the right information to make the best decision.
Can one landlord get the tax exemption on several apartments?
Yes. An individual landlord can currently claim Argentina’s Income Tax exemption across several residential units if every unit meets the permanent-home test.
This is one of the more generous parts of Decree 406. The text says the exemption reaches all units that the individual or undivided estate assigns to qualifying residential use.
There is no one-apartment limit, and there is no two-apartment limit.
That is worth separating from another Argentine rental benefit that does contain a cap. Under the Monotributo rules linked to Law 27,737, someone whose income comes exclusively from renting up to two properties can qualify for an exemption from the integrated Monotributo tax if the other requirements are met. ARCA still describes that two-property benefit separately in its current guidance.
The new Income Tax exemption works differently. Someone personally holding six apartments could potentially exempt the qualifying rental income from all six. Someone with one Airbnb-style tourist apartment could fail the test entirely.
The reform therefore favors the type of rental more than the size of the landlord’s portfolio.
Does the apartment have to be the tenant’s main home?
Yes. Argentina’s rental tax exemption currently depends on the property being the tenant’s unique, family and permanent home.
This requirement is stricter than simply saying that an apartment must be “residential.”
A normal long-term tenant who lives in the apartment year-round is the easy case. A second residence, occasional city apartment or holiday property is much harder to fit within the wording used by Decree 406.
The word unique creates the awkward part. A person could genuinely spend most of the year in a rented apartment while still owning or maintaining another home elsewhere. The landlord may have little visibility over that situation, yet the tenant’s circumstances can affect the landlord’s exemption.
Recent Argentine tax commentary has focused heavily on this point because the original law spoke about property rented as casa-habitación, while the implementing decree added the more specific ideas of unique, family and permanent occupation. BDO Argentina has argued that the decree went beyond merely explaining the law and actually reduced the scope Congress had approved.
That disagreement has not disappeared. For now, anyone taking the conservative tax position should work from the narrower definition contained in the decree.
Get to know the market before buying a property in Argentina
Better information leads to better decisions. Get all the data you need before investing a large amount of money.
Can an Airbnb or short-term rental get Argentina’s new tax break?
Airbnb-style tourist rentals are currently poor candidates for Argentina’s new rental exemption because temporary visitors normally do not make the property their unique and permanent home.
The dividing line is how the occupant actually lives in the property.
A furnished apartment can still qualify. Decree 406 specifically includes payments for furniture, accessories and services supplied by the landlord within exempt rental income when the underlying home itself qualifies. Furnishing a property therefore does not turn it into a tourist rental for tax purposes.
A family renting a furnished apartment for two years as its home has a strong case. A traveler staying for five nights does not.
The middle ground is less clean. A foreign executive living in Argentina for ten months, a university student renting during the academic year or a worker temporarily assigned to another province may genuinely live in the property while still maintaining another home. Those cases run directly into the “unique” and “permanent” language.
Duration helps, but it does not settle the question. The better test is whether the occupant actually established the apartment as their home rather than trying to invent a minimum number of months that the decree itself never provides.
| Type of rental | Current qualification outlook | Main issue | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary long-term family home | Strong | Fits permanent-home definition | High |
| Furnished long-term home | Strong | Furniture does not block exemption | High |
| Student accommodation | Depends on facts | May not be unique or permanent | Medium |
| Temporary expatriate housing | Depends on facts | Other residence may remain | Medium |
| Holiday rental | Weak | Temporary occupation | High |
| Airbnb-style tourist stay | Weak | Not a permanent home | High |
Can a company that owns apartments claim the exemption?
Under Decree 406, a company that owns rental apartments currently sits outside the new residential rental exemption, although tax specialists are openly questioning whether the government had the power to exclude it.
This is one of the few parts of the reform where the legal answer really is messy.
Law 27,802 exempted gains from rentals used as casa-habitación. The law itself did not clearly say that the landlord had to be an individual. Decree 406 later framed the exemption around personas humanas and sucesiones indivisas.
BDO Argentina has taken a particularly strong position, arguing that the decree introduced a subjective restriction that Congress had not included and describing that restriction as unconstitutional. El Cronista reported the same dispute when tax specialists examined the regulation, including the exclusion of companies and trusts.
In practice, though, the decree is the rule taxpayers are dealing with today. A company simply filing as though its residential rental income were unquestionably exempt would be taking a materially more aggressive position than an individual owner.
For investors, the ownership structure can therefore change the answer even when the apartment, tenant and rent are identical.
Buying real estate in Argentina can be risky
An increasing number of foreign investors are showing interest. However, 90% of them will make mistakes. Avoid the pitfalls with our comprehensive guide.
What if a company rents the apartment for one of its employees?
A corporate lease for an employee is currently much less secure than a lease signed directly by the employee, even when the apartment is obviously being used as a home.
The wording of Decree 406 creates the problem. For rental property, the casa-habitación test refers to the locatario or sublocatario, meaning the tenant or subtenant.
Suppose a multinational signs a two-year lease and places one executive in the apartment. The executive may genuinely live there with their family, but the tenant named on the contract is the company. A corporation cannot literally have a family home.
A different structure produces a stronger case. If the employee signs the lease personally and the employer pays the rent or guarantees the contract, the named tenant is now an individual who can actually use the apartment as a permanent home.
The decree does not provide a detailed corporate-housing regime, so this should not be stretched into a universal rule. But as things stand, the contract structure can genuinely affect whether the exemption looks defensible.
That can influence an ordinary leasing decision, not just what eventually appears on a tax return.
Can foreign property owners qualify for Argentina’s new tax break?
Foreign individuals can currently benefit from Argentina’s property-sale exemption, and living outside Argentina does not by itself disqualify them.
Decree 406 explicitly covers individuals and undivided estates resident either in Argentina or abroad when it deals with qualifying sales of Argentine real estate and transfers of rights over Argentine property.
Nationality is therefore not the key test.
A French tax resident selling an apartment in Buenos Aires can fall within the exemption. So can an Argentine citizen living permanently abroad. The important questions are the nature of the seller, where the property is located and whether the transaction falls within the part of the Income Tax Law covered by the exemption.
Cross-border cases can still become more complicated because Argentina has rules designed to prevent an exemption from simply transferring tax revenue to another country. A seller may also owe tax in the country where they live even when Argentina does not tax the gain.
So “foreign owners qualify” is accurate as an Argentine eligibility statement. It does not mean that every foreign owner ends up paying zero tax worldwide.
Don't lose money on your property in Argentina
100% of people who have lost money there have spent less than 1 hour researching the market. We have reviewed everything there is to know. Grab our guide now.
Are ordinary property sales in Argentina basically Income Tax-free now?
For many individuals, yes. Ordinary qualifying property sales in Argentina now face a dramatically lighter federal tax burden than they did a few years ago.
To understand how large the change is, we have to combine two reforms rather than look only at the latest one.
Older properties were historically associated with the Impuesto a la Transferencia de Inmuebles, or ITI, which charged 1.5% of the transfer price in relevant cases. Argentina abolished ITI through Law 27,743.
Properties falling under the newer regime could instead generate a 15% tax on the gain under Article 99 of the Income Tax Law. Law 27,802 and Decree 406 now exempt qualifying individual sales and transfers covered by that provision.
Together, those two changes remove much of the old federal tax friction from ordinary individual property disposals.
The word ordinary still matters. A company selling property remains inside corporate taxation. Someone whose activity looks like a real-estate business can also fall under business-income rules. Local transaction costs and provincial taxes have not vanished either.
But for an individual who bought an apartment as an investment and later sells it outside a trading business, the federal tax position is much more favorable today than it was under either of the previous regimes.
| Seller / property situation | Earlier federal treatment | Current broad position |
|---|---|---|
| Individual with property under old ITI regime | 1.5% ITI in qualifying cases | ITI abolished |
| Individual with Article 99 property gain | Gain could face 15% tax | Qualifying gain exempt |
| Individual selling qualifying principal home | Favorable treatment already existed | Remains favorable |
| Company selling property | Corporate tax rules | Still taxed under corporate regime |
| Professional property trader | Business-income rules can apply | New exemption does not automatically shelter business profit |
Can someone keep flipping properties and pay no Income Tax?
No. Argentina’s new property-sale exemption does not give professional or habitual property traders an obvious route to tax-free business profits.
The distinction becomes important once buying and selling stops looking like investment and starts looking like a business.
Someone who bought an apartment, rented it for several years and eventually sells it is close to the ordinary investment case covered by the reform. A developer repeatedly buying lots, building units and selling them to customers is doing something very different economically.
Argentina does not give us a simple rule such as “three sales make you a trader.” Frequency, organization, intention and the way the activity is carried on all become relevant.
The edges will still produce disputes. But the central point is pretty clear: the reform was not written as a blanket exemption for profits generated by operating a real-estate business.
This is also why the corporate-versus-individual distinction cannot be understood only as a choice of legal wrapper. The underlying activity matters too.
Get the full checklist for your due diligence in Argentina
Don't repeat the same mistakes others have made before you. Make sure everything is in order before signing your sales contract.
Do old rental contracts qualify, or only new ones?
Existing rental contracts qualify too: Argentina’s exemption applies to eligible residential rental income generated from the new regime onward regardless of when the lease was originally signed.
Decree 406 states this directly.
That makes the change more immediate than an incentive limited to new contracts. A landlord did not need to wait until an old lease expired, renegotiate it or sign a replacement contract purely to enter the new Income Tax regime.
Imagine two identical apartments with tenants using each one as their permanent home. One lease was signed before the reform and the other afterward. The signing date does not create a different Income Tax result for qualifying rent generated during the exempt period.
Argentina therefore changed the tax treatment of the existing residential rental stock, rather than only trying to influence future supply.
The property’s acquisition date still matters when reconstructing which sales regime applied historically, but it is not the gatekeeper for this rental exemption.
How valuable is Argentina’s rental tax exemption for an owner?
Argentina’s rental exemption can be very valuable for a landlord who previously paid Income Tax at a high marginal rate, while an owner with little taxable income may barely notice the change.
There is no sensible single percentage saving for every landlord.
Before the reform, rental profit could feed into an individual’s taxable Income Tax calculation. Argentina’s individual rates are progressive and can reach 35%. The actual tax saved therefore depends on taxable profit, deductible expenses and the owner’s other income.
Take two landlords earning the same rent from identical apartments. If one already has substantial taxable income and the additional rental profit would have landed near the top of the scale, removing that profit from Income Tax can save a meaningful amount. If the other landlord was paying little or no Income Tax anyway, the cash benefit is much smaller.
The reform is broad in eligibility but uneven in value.
There is another detail worth watching. ARCA’s public rental guidance still contains material describing the pre-existing 10% deduction available to landlords under Law 27,737. Decree 406 now says that this particular deduction does not apply when the landlord is an individual or undivided estate covered by the new exemption. Anyone relying on older explanatory pages without checking the new decree can end up mixing two regimes that no longer stack in the same way.
Don't sign a document you don't understand in Argentina
Buying a property over there? We have reviewed all the documents you need to know. Stay out of trouble - grab our comprehensive guide.
Does the new exemption mean a rental property is tax-free?
No. A landlord can currently pay zero national Income Tax on qualifying residential rent and still owe other taxes or have filing and invoicing obligations.
ARCA continues to tell landlords that rental activity must be properly registered and documented. Monotributistas issue electronic C invoices, while taxpayers in the general regime follow the invoicing rules that apply to their status.
Provincial taxes remain another layer. ARBA currently states that property rental is subject to Buenos Aires Province’s Gross Income Tax and publishes specific income thresholds for its provincial exemption. That regime exists independently from the new national Income Tax exemption.
Owners can also face provincial real-estate tax, Buenos Aires City Inmobiliario/ABL where relevant, and Personal Assets Tax depending on their circumstances.
So the practical tax bill can fall considerably without disappearing.
| Tax or obligation | Removed by the new Income Tax exemption? | Current position |
|---|---|---|
| Income Tax on qualifying residential rent | Yes | Main new benefit |
| ARCA registration | No | Landlord obligations continue |
| Rental invoicing | No | Electronic documentation still required |
| Provincial Gross Income Tax | No | Depends on provincial rules and exemptions |
| Provincial / city property tax | No | Continues separately |
| Personal Assets Tax | No | Separate national rules apply |
Is this the same tax break as Buenos Aires property-tax exemptions?
No. Buenos Aires property-tax relief and Argentina’s new national rental and sale exemptions follow separate rules, so qualifying for one tells us very little about whether someone qualifies for another.
The tests can point in opposite directions.
The national residential rental exemption allows an individual to have several qualifying apartments. Some local property-tax benefits, by contrast, focus specifically on a single home or impose valuation and ownership conditions.
Buenos Aires Province also has its own exemptions and credits under provincial legislation. Its Gross Income Tax treatment of rental income is another separate question again.
Someone could therefore receive the new national Income Tax exemption on rent while continuing to pay a local property tax. Another owner might receive local relief on a home yet have no rental income to exempt nationally.
For readers trying to work out whether a particular property is “tax-free,” combining all of those regimes into one label creates more confusion than clarity.
Get fresh and reliable information about the market in Argentina
Don't base significant investment decisions on outdated data. Get updated and accurate information.
What is the biggest problem with the new rental exemption right now?
The biggest problem with Argentina’s rental exemption today is that the landlord’s tax treatment partly depends on facts about the tenant that may be difficult for the landlord to verify.
The decree asks whether the rented property is the tenant’s unique, family and permanent home.
A landlord can verify the lease. The landlord can see who pays the rent and can state that the property may only be used for residential purposes. It is much harder to know whether the tenant owns another apartment, keeps a permanent home in another country or has quietly turned the property into a second residence.
That problem is more than theoretical because the decree made the eligibility test tighter than the wording originally passed by Congress. As noted above, BDO Argentina and other tax specialists have argued that the executive branch added restrictions rather than simply clarifying the law.
The company exclusion raises the same broader issue. If courts eventually find that Decree 406 went beyond the law, the practical scope of the exemption could widen.
For now, the safer reading remains the decree’s narrower one. But confidence here should be lower than on straightforward points such as the absence of a property-count limit or the inclusion of existing leases.
So who actually gets Argentina’s new property tax break?
Argentina’s new property tax break currently works best for individuals who directly own property, rent it as someone’s genuine permanent home or sell qualifying Argentine real estate outside a property-trading business.
That answer is broader than it first appears.
A landlord does not have to own just one apartment. Decree 406 allows qualifying individuals and undivided estates to apply the rental exemption across all units that satisfy the residential test. Existing leases can qualify too, and a furnished home does not lose the exemption merely because the owner supplies furniture or services.
The sale rules are also unusually favorable now. Combined with the earlier abolition of ITI, the latest reform means many ordinary individual property disposals have lost the federal tax burden that previously applied either to the transfer price or to the gain.
The boundaries become less comfortable once we move away from ordinary individual ownership. Tourist rentals have a weak case. Corporate housing creates contract-level uncertainty. Companies are excluded by the decree even though tax specialists are challenging whether that exclusion was legally justified. Professional property businesses cannot safely turn operating profits into exempt gains simply by pointing to the new rule.
So the answer to the title is clear: the break is real and surprisingly broad for individual residential investors, but it is not a general exemption for everyone who owns property in Argentina. Today, the strongest candidates are individual landlords serving genuine permanent residents and individual sellers making ordinary qualifying property disposals. Companies, short-term rental operators and professional traders remain on much shakier ground.
Get to know the market before buying a property in Argentina
Better information leads to better decisions. Get all the data you need before investing a large amount of money.
OUR METHODOLOGY
Who qualifies for Argentina’s new property tax break is not a question we answer from one headline rule. Eligibility changes with the owner, the use of the property, the type of transaction and the tax being discussed, so we broke the analysis into those separate dimensions before forming the overall conclusion.
For the core rules, we prioritized primary material. Article 192 of Law 27,802 provides the statutory basis for the new Income Tax exemptions, while Decree 406/2026 is the main source for how the government is currently applying them, including the definition of casa-habitación, the treatment of individuals and undivided estates, existing leases, multiple qualifying units and property sales.
We treated national and local taxes separately throughout the analysis. The new exemption concerns national Income Tax, while Buenos Aires City Inmobiliario/ABL, provincial property taxes, provincial Gross Income Tax and Personal Assets Tax operate under separate rules and can continue to apply.
The permanent-home test is interpreted using the wording currently contained in Decree 406: unique, family and permanent occupation by the tenant or subtenant. We did not invent a minimum lease duration because the decree itself does not provide one.
Where the law and decree do not line up neatly, we did not flatten the disagreement into a single certain answer. In particular, the decree’s restriction of the rental exemption to individuals and undivided estates, and its narrower definition of qualifying residential use, have been challenged by Argentine tax specialists as restrictions that may go beyond the wording enacted by Congress.
We also kept the new Income Tax exemption separate from older or parallel benefits. The two-property Monotributo rule has its own conditions and portfolio cap, while the new Income Tax rental exemption does not impose a one-property or two-property ceiling on qualifying individual landlords.
For property sales, we looked at the reforms together rather than in isolation. Law 27,743 abolished the former ITI regime, while Law 27,802 and Decree 406 changed the treatment of qualifying gains that could previously fall under Article 99 of the Income Tax Law.
We gave less confidence to cases where eligibility depends on facts the rules do not resolve cleanly, such as corporate housing, temporary expatriate accommodation, students maintaining another residence, or repeated property transactions that may begin to look like a business. Straightforward permanent residential leases and ordinary individual investment sales are much cleaner cases.
Key sources include Law 27,802, Decree 406/2026, the current consolidated Income Tax Law, Law 27,743 on the abolition of ITI, ARCA’s current Monotributo guidance, ARCA’s rental invoicing guidance, AGIP’s Inmobiliario/ABL guidance, and ARBA’s guidance on Gross Income Tax for property rentals.
For the contested parts of the decree, we cross-checked the primary material against recent reporting and specialist commentary, including El Cronista’s reporting on the dispute over Decree 406, La Nación’s June analysis of the rental exemption, and La Nación’s August follow-up on the practical problems created by the tenant-use test.
The final answer comes from aggregating those dimensions rather than treating every source or edge case as equally important. That is why we are confident that ordinary individual residential landlords and qualifying individual sellers are the clearest beneficiaries, while companies, tourist rentals, corporate housing and professional property trading require much more caution.
Buying real estate in Argentina can be risky
An increasing number of foreign investors are showing interest. However, 90% of them will make mistakes. Avoid the pitfalls with our comprehensive guide.
Related blog posts
- Is Argentina a good place to live as an expat?
- Will property prices rise in Argentina?
- Are property prices in Argentina still rising?
- How much is rent in Argentina now?
