Get all the data you need about the real estate market in Colombia
SUMMARY
Yes. Colombia’s Airbnb rules are getting stricter, mainly because authorities are verifying more of the rules that hosts could previously satisfy with declarations and paperwork.
The biggest national change is not a ban on Airbnb. It is a push to make the Registro Nacional de Turismo harder to obtain or keep when the host, property, building rules, land use, or other records do not line up.
MinCIT’s proposed RNT overhaul matters because it targets a weak point in the current system: much of the registration process still depends on information supplied by the operator. The reform would give chambers of commerce and public agencies more ways to cross-check those declarations.
That makes propiedad horizontal one of the biggest practical risks for apartment hosts. A unit can have demand, good economics and even an RNT, but still fail if the building’s registered regulations do not authorize tourist accommodation.
Medellín is already showing what stricter enforcement looks like in practice. The city is checking short-term rentals against planning rules, licences, building regulations and guest-reporting obligations instead of treating the RNT as the end of the compliance process.
The 30-day line is also becoming less useful as a loophole. A genuine medium-term residential tenancy can fall into a different category, but authorities in Medellín have already flagged cases where contracts longer than 30 days may have been used to disguise revolving tourist stays.
Platform enforcement is another pressure point. Colombia does not need to inspect every apartment if platforms can be pushed to reject inactive, mismatched or invalid registrations before a listing reaches guests.
Local enforcement is uneven. Medellín looks much tougher than Bogotá, where active tourist-home registrations are still growing, so the evidence does not support the idea of a single nationwide campaign to eliminate legal Airbnb supply.
Cartagena adds a different kind of risk: approved property use. Apartments marketed successfully to tourists can still face enforcement if the building or unit remains authorized only for residential use.
For buyers, the practical takeaway is fairly sharp. An active RNT should be treated as one compliance document, not as proof that an apartment is fully legal for short-term rental; the building rules, land use, licences, guest reporting and other operating obligations need separate checks.
Thinking of buying real estate in Colombia?
Acquiring property in a different country is a complex task. Don't fall into common traps – grab our guide and make better decisions.
Are Colombia’s Airbnb rules actually getting stricter now?
Yes. Colombia is currently making short-term rentals harder to operate casually, mainly by tightening verification and enforcement around rules that already existed.
The biggest national development is MinCIT’s proposed overhaul of the Registro Nacional de Turismo, or RNT. The ministry published a revised draft for public consultation after already working on an earlier version, which shows that the reform has survived several rounds of discussion with platforms, tourism businesses, host groups and other industry participants.
The government’s own justification explains why it wants the change. Authorities believe the current RNT system relies too heavily on information declared by tourism operators and does not give chambers of commerce enough tools to verify whether that information is true.
The proposal would allow much more checking across government databases and would strengthen the obligations of digital tourism platforms. Information could be compared with records held by DIAN, municipalities, Migración Colombia and other authorities instead of sitting in separate systems.
For Airbnb hosts, that is a meaningful change. Getting an RNT has never been the only legal requirement, but historically there could be a large gap between what a host declared and what authorities actually verified. Colombia is now trying to close that gap.
The reform is still a proposal as of now, so its new requirements should not be presented as final law. Existing rules under Law 2068 and Decree 1836 remain the legal baseline today.
| Airbnb rule | What already exists | What is changing | Practical effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| RNT | Mandatory for tourist accommodation | Stronger verification proposed | Incorrect registrations become easier to catch |
| Host information | Mostly supplied during registration | More cross-checking proposed | Less room for inconsistent declarations |
| Platform checks | Active RNT already required | Stronger validation proposed | Invalid listings become easier to identify |
| Government data | Held across different agencies | More interoperability proposed | Authorities can compare records |
| Local compliance | Already legally relevant | Being checked more actively | RNT alone gives less comfort |
Were Airbnb rentals already regulated in Colombia?
Yes. Colombia has regulated tourist apartments for years, so today’s crackdown is mostly about making existing Airbnb rules harder to ignore.
Decree 2590 introduced a specific framework for viviendas turísticas back in 2009. One important rule was already there: when a property belongs to a propiedad horizontal, tourist accommodation must be allowed by the building’s regulations.
Law 1558 later gave building administrators a role in enforcement. Administrators are supposed to report tourist rentals operating without the required registration or against the building’s rules.
The framework became stronger again with Law 2068 and Decree 1836. Digital platforms offering tourism services came inside the tourism-regulation system, and tourist accommodation providers had to hold an active RNT. Airbnb currently tells Colombian hosts that an RNT is required before operating and that the registration number has to appear on the listing.
So the rules themselves did not suddenly appear. What feels different now is how often authorities are checking the other side of the registration: whether that particular apartment, building and location can legally be used for tourist accommodation.
Don't buy the wrong property, in the wrong area of Colombia
Buying real estate is a significant investment. Don't rely solely on your intuition. Gather the right information to make the best decision.
Is the RNT getting harder for Airbnb hosts to obtain?
Potentially yes. Colombia’s proposed RNT reform would make some registrations much easier for authorities to verify and much harder for hosts to support with a simple declaration.
Property-horizontal rules are a good example. Under the current system, a host registering tourist accommodation has to declare that the building regulations authorize that activity.
The draft reform would demand stronger evidence. For properties governed by propiedad horizontal, applicants could have to provide the registered building regulations and identify the provision allowing tourist accommodation. Another route contemplated by the draft is certification from the building administrator confirming that the activity is permitted.
That changes the practical test. A host whose building clearly authorizes tourist accommodation should still have a straightforward case. Someone relying on vague wording, an informal arrangement with management or years of tolerance would be in a weaker position.
The draft would also strengthen permanent verification by chambers of commerce. According to MinCIT’s justification for the reform, one objective is to detect discrepancies between registration information and records held elsewhere in government.
As of today, these additional requirements have not all become final law. But they show pretty clearly where Colombia thinks the current RNT system is too easy to game.
| RNT issue | Current position | Proposed direction | Most exposed hosts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building permission | Declaration during registration | Documentary verification | Units in residential buildings |
| Property details | Information supplied by operator | More database checking | Properties with inconsistent records |
| Host identity | Registration information | Stronger authentication | Borrowed or mismatched registrations |
| Multiple units | Separate registrations generally required | Easier matching of RNT to property | Multi-unit operators |
| Continuing compliance | Renewal required | More ongoing verification | Properties whose legal situation changed |
Can Airbnb listings in Colombia be removed more easily now?
Increasingly, yes. Colombia is building a system where an invalid Airbnb listing can be caught through registration checks instead of waiting for somebody to complain.
Platforms already have legal responsibilities under Law 2068. Digital tourism platforms have to interact with the RNT system and should not advertise tourism providers that lack the registration required to operate.
The proposed national reform goes further. It would strengthen the matching between the tourism provider, the property and the RNT used on the platform. The draft also contemplates periodic verification of active registrations.
There is another useful current clue in MinCIT’s own database. Airbnb Ireland Unlimited Company appears in Colombia’s RNT records under the category for operators of electronic or digital tourism-service platforms, alongside companies such as Booking.com, Expedia and Hotels.com. Platforms themselves are therefore inside the formal tourism system.
This gives Colombian authorities a much more scalable enforcement route. Checking thousands of apartments physically is expensive. Making platforms reject registrations that are inactive, mismatched or invalid can remove non-compliant supply directly where customers book it.
Get to know the market before buying a property in Colombia
Better information leads to better decisions. Get all the data you need before investing a large amount of money.
Does every Airbnb in Colombia need an RNT?
An apartment repeatedly offered as short-term tourist accommodation generally needs an RNT in Colombia, including tourist homes rented for stays of less than 30 days.
MinCIT’s formalization guidance treats viviendas turísticas as tourism-service providers and includes them among the businesses that must register. The requirement applies to urban and rural tourist homes and does not disappear simply because the accommodation is an apartment rather than a hotel.
Airbnb gives Colombian hosts the same guidance: operators need to complete the national tourism registration process and display the corresponding RNT.
That distinction becomes important because a residential lease and tourist accommodation can look similar from the outside. Both may involve a furnished apartment and a paying occupant. The legal treatment changes when the property is being operated as short-stay tourist lodging.
The 30-day threshold is useful, but the actual way the property is being operated still matters.
Can Colombian Airbnb hosts avoid the rules with 30-day contracts?
A genuine monthly residential rental can fall into a different legal category, but using longer contracts on paper to disguise repeated tourist stays is becoming risky in Colombia.
Medellín has already said its inspectors found possible attempts to evade short-term-rental controls through contracts written for periods exceeding 30 days even though the underlying activity appeared to be temporary accommodation.
That is more interesting than the threshold itself. Authorities are showing that they may examine what happens inside the property rather than accepting the contract length at face value.
Medellín has also been working with Migración Colombia on information exchanges that can help identify properties accommodating foreigners and check whether the required reporting is taking place. That creates another way to compare the declared use of an apartment with how it actually operates.
A 31-day contract should not be treated as an automatic loophole. It works naturally when the arrangement really is a medium- or long-term residential tenancy. It becomes much harder to defend when the same unit keeps behaving like a revolving tourist accommodation business.
Buying real estate in Colombia can be risky
An increasing number of foreign investors are showing interest. However, 90% of them will make mistakes. Avoid the pitfalls with our comprehensive guide.
Can a Colombian apartment building simply ban Airbnb?
Yes. A Colombian apartment can have an RNT and still be unable to operate legally as an Airbnb because the propiedad horizontal does not authorize tourist accommodation.
This rule has existed for years, but it is becoming far more important in practice.
Medellín’s latest guidance for short-term-rental operators states clearly that a property inside a building or residential complex needs express authorization in the propiedad-horizontal regulations. If that authorization does not exist, the owners’ assembly has to approve the activity and the change has to be formalized appropriately.
Building administrators also have legal responsibilities. Medellín currently reminds administrators that they must enforce their internal rules, report irregularities and protect residents’ right to peaceful use of the building.
The proposed RNT overhaul could make this even harder to sidestep by requiring stronger evidence that the building really allows the activity.
For people buying Colombian property specifically for Airbnb, this is one of the first documents we would check now. Verbal assurances from an agent, owner or building employee are weak evidence when the registered propiedad-horizontal rules say something different.
Is Medellín cracking down harder on Airbnb than the rest of Colombia?
Yes. Medellín currently gives us the clearest example of short-term-rental rules moving from paperwork into repeated physical enforcement.
The numbers are substantial enough to show a pattern. Medellín previously said that roughly 80% of the city’s short-term-rental supply was concentrated across El Poblado, Laureles, Belén, La Candelaria and Santa Elena. Those areas then became priorities for inspections.
During another enforcement period, the city compiled 93 technical reports involving possible planning violations. Laureles accounted for 21 cases, San Cristóbal 19, El Poblado 16 and La Candelaria 13. Officials identified 34 locations without the required licence and another 11 cases in protected stream-setback areas.
Medellín has also reported checking 135 tourist homes during 2025, with 51 showing some form of non-compliance. That works out to about 38% of the inspected tourist homes. We should not treat that percentage as a citywide non-compliance rate because inspectors are likely to target suspicious properties, but it does show that these checks frequently find something.
El Poblado has received its own operations. Authorities handled 71 requests involving coexistence problems or short-term rentals in residential buildings, plus 18 requests to examine possible land-use irregularities.
The freshest municipal guidance reinforces the same approach. Medellín now explicitly tells operators to check RNT, propiedad-horizontal authorization, compatible land use, construction authorization, RUT and commercial registration, SIRE and accommodation reporting, fire-safety compliance and other tourism obligations.
At this point, Medellín Airbnb compliance goes well beyond adding an RNT number to a listing.
| Medellín enforcement measure | Reported result | What was being checked |
|---|---|---|
| Tourist homes inspected in 2025 | 135 | Tourism and operating compliance |
| Tourist homes with problems | 51 | Various infringements |
| Recent technical reports | 93 | Land use, licences and property rules |
| Locations found without licence | 34 | Required authorization |
| El Poblado coexistence/rental requests | 71 | Problems in residential buildings |
| El Poblado land-use requests | 18 | Possible planning violations |
Don't lose money on your property in Colombia
100% of people who have lost money there have spent less than 1 hour researching the market. We have reviewed everything there is to know. Grab our guide now.
Could Medellín restrict Airbnb to certain parts of the city?
Yes. Medellín is currently using urban planning to decide where short-term tourist accommodation belongs, which could eventually remove some residential properties from the viable Airbnb market.
Land use already matters today. Medellín’s latest public guidance tells prospective operators to verify that the property sits in an area where the Plan de Ordenamiento Territorial permits the activity, including relevant medium- and high-mixed-use areas.
The larger question is what happens through the ongoing POT revision. Medellín has been examining a more explicit treatment of vivienda turística, with tourist accommodation directed toward compatible mixed-use areas and other selected zones.
A change of use can also create another requirement. When an ordinary residential property is converted into accommodation use, the corresponding construction or adaptation authorization may be necessary depending on the property.
This is particularly important in neighborhoods where Airbnb demand is excellent but residential protection is politically sensitive. El Poblado and Laureles can produce attractive short-term-rental economics while also generating many of the complaints that have pushed the city toward tighter controls.
The exact future map still depends on the planning process. We can nevertheless be quite confident about the direction: Medellín wants more control over where tourist apartments operate.
Is Cartagena tightening Airbnb rules too?
Yes. Cartagena is also enforcing restrictions on tourist rentals, especially where apartments are being used for tourism despite residential-only authorization.
Urban-control cases in Cartagena have already shown that an apartment’s popularity with tourists does not override its legal use. Authorities have acted against short-term accommodation where the approved use of a property or building remained residential.
Cartagena also appears in the proposed national RNT reform in a particularly interesting way. For certain island and coastal areas within the district, including places such as Barú, Tierra Bomba and the Rosario Islands, the draft would allow stronger verification of the property’s land-use authorization during the registration process.
That moves an important check earlier. Instead of issuing a tourism registration and discovering much later that local land-use rules conflict with the operation, the system could catch that contradiction while the host is applying.
Cartagena’s enforcement is currently less documented at scale than Medellín’s short-term-rental campaign, so we should be more cautious about calling it a citywide crackdown. But the underlying risk for owners is already real: a residential apartment cannot safely be treated as tourist accommodation merely because similar units nearby appear on Airbnb.
Get the full checklist for your due diligence in Colombia
Don't repeat the same mistakes others have made before you. Make sure everything is in order before signing your sales contract.
Is Bogotá cracking down on Airbnb too?
Bogotá is tightening formalization, but we currently see much less evidence of a Medellín-style effort to remove short-term rentals from specific residential areas.
The latest city numbers are revealing. Bogotá reported 14,264 tourism-service providers with active RNT registrations at the end of April, 7.1% more than a year earlier.
Tourist homes contributed 689 of the 949 additional active registrations over that period. That means viviendas turísticas alone produced roughly 73% of the net increase in registered tourism providers.
The category itself grew 8.8% year over year. That is difficult to square with the idea that Bogotá is currently trying to suppress legal tourist housing across the city. Registered supply is still expanding.
Bogotá has nevertheless been pushing operators toward formal compliance through RNT renewal campaigns and broader tourism obligations. It has also linked formal tourism businesses to safety, human-rights and prevention requirements.
The contrast with Medellín is useful. Colombian Airbnb regulation is getting stricter, but local governments are applying that framework differently. Bogotá currently looks more like a formalization market, while Medellín is combining formalization with aggressive property-level inspections and land-use controls.
| Bogotá measure | Latest reported figure | What it tells us |
|---|---|---|
| Active RNT tourism providers | 14,264 | Large formal tourism sector |
| Annual growth | 7.1% | Registered sector is still expanding |
| Net new active providers | 949 | Formalization continues |
| New tourist-home registrations | 689 | Tourist homes drove most of the increase |
| Tourist-home growth | 8.8% | Legal tourist housing remains a growing category |
Are Colombian authorities checking Airbnb guests through immigration data now?
Medellín is beginning to connect short-term-rental enforcement with Migración Colombia data, although we are not yet looking at a fully automated national system tracking every Airbnb reservation.
The city has publicly confirmed information exchanges with Migración Colombia to help identify properties where foreigners are staying and check whether operators are meeting their reporting obligations.
Medellín’s stated objective is practical: authorities want better traceability when apartments may be operating as unregistered short-term accommodation.
That becomes more powerful when combined with rules that already require tourist operators to report guests through systems such as SIRE and the Tarjeta de Registro de Alojamiento.
The proposed national RNT reform follows the same logic on a larger scale. MinCIT wants information held by different government entities to become easier to compare, including records connected to tax, tourism, municipalities and migration.
We should keep the current capability in perspective. There is no good evidence that every Airbnb booking in Colombia is now automatically cross-checked against immigration records. What has changed is the authorities’ ability and willingness to connect these datasets when investigating a property.
Don't sign a document you don't understand in Colombia
Buying a property over there? We have reviewed all the documents you need to know. Stay out of trouble - grab our comprehensive guide.
Are Colombian Airbnb hosts facing more than just RNT checks?
Definitely. Running a legal short-term rental in Colombia now involves several compliance layers, and Medellín’s latest guidance makes that unusually explicit.
The city’s current checklist for viviendas de renta corta includes an active RNT, express authorization under propiedad horizontal when applicable, compatible land use under the POT, the relevant construction authorization, RUT registration with DIAN, mercantile registration, SIRE reporting for foreign guests, the Tarjeta de Registro de Alojamiento and compliance with fire and human-safety requirements.
There are also rules aimed at protecting children and preventing sexual exploitation. Medellín recently released a dedicated guide for tourist-home owners and administrators covering the full guest cycle, from promotion and booking through check-in, visitors and incident management. Its new Tourism Security Plan for 2026–2030 puts inspection and control directly inside the city’s tourism-safety strategy.
Consumer protection adds another layer. Colombia’s consumer authority has warned accommodation providers against practices such as cancelling confirmed bookings to resell rooms at much higher prices during periods of exceptional demand.
These obligations make the casual-host model increasingly awkward. Someone operating one apartment may still have a small business economically, but regulators increasingly expect that host to behave like a tourism operator legally.
| Compliance layer | What a host may need to prove | Who can check it |
|---|---|---|
| Tourism registration | Active RNT | Chambers of commerce / tourism authorities |
| Building permission | Propiedad-horizontal authorization | Building administration / authorities |
| Land use | Tourist accommodation allowed there | Municipality |
| Property authorization | Required construction/use licence | Urban authorities |
| Tax/business formalities | RUT and commercial registration | DIAN / chambers of commerce |
| Guest records | SIRE and TRA reporting | Tourism / migration authorities |
| Safety | Fire and human-safety requirements | Local authorities |
Is Colombia going after Airbnb itself or individual hosts?
Colombia is putting pressure on the whole booking chain, with hosts, properties, building administrators and platforms each carrying part of the compliance burden.
Hosts need the appropriate tourism registration and have to comply with the rules governing the property. Buildings can block tourist accommodation through their registered propiedad-horizontal rules. Municipalities can stop operations that conflict with land-use or construction requirements.
Platforms have their own responsibilities. Colombian tourism law requires qualifying digital platforms to register and prevent unregistered tourism providers from operating through them. The latest proposed RNT rules would make verification between the platform, host and registration more systematic.
This approach gives authorities leverage without having to target Airbnb as a company or ban the platform. If an apartment fails at any important point in the chain, its ability to stay online can eventually disappear.
Medellín’s recent enforcement adds another gatekeeper: building administrators. The city has explicitly reminded them that they must enforce internal regulations and report unauthorized rental activity.
That makes short-term-rental compliance much less dependent on a single government inspector discovering a listing.
Get fresh and reliable information about the market in Colombia
Don't base significant investment decisions on outdated data. Get updated and accurate information.
Does having an RNT mean an Airbnb is legal in Colombia?
No. An active RNT proves that a tourism provider is registered; it does not prove that a particular Colombian apartment satisfies every rule required for short-term rental.
This is probably the most important distinction for anyone buying an Airbnb investment in Colombia today.
A property can still have problems with its building rules. It can sit in an area where the relevant tourist use is prohibited. It can lack a required construction or adaptation authorization. Guest-reporting, tax, commercial and safety requirements exist separately.
Medellín provides a good illustration. Municipal inspectors are checking land use, licences, the official destination of buildings and propiedad-horizontal rules alongside tourism formalities. Authorities have found dozens of locations with licensing problems even while Colombia already has a mature RNT system.
The national reform is heading toward stronger verification partly because these different layers have historically been able to contradict one another.
For due diligence, we would therefore treat the RNT as one document among several rather than as a certificate that settles the legality of the business.
| Question | What the RNT tells us | What still needs checking |
|---|---|---|
| Is the host registered? | Yes, if RNT is active | Identity and continuing validity |
| Does the building allow Airbnb? | No | Propiedad-horizontal regulations |
| Does local zoning allow tourist use? | No | POT / municipal land use |
| Is the property’s approved use correct? | No | Licences and official property records |
| Are guests reported properly? | No | SIRE / TRA compliance |
| Does the operation meet safety rules? | No | Local certificates and inspections |
Are Colombia’s Airbnb rules likely to get even stricter?
Yes. Everything we have checked recently points toward more verification and more property-level enforcement rather than a return to loose oversight.
The national RNT proposal has now gone through more than one consultation round, which makes it harder to dismiss as a temporary political idea. MinCIT continues to pursue stronger verification, better information and tighter obligations for digital tourism platforms.
Medellín has gone much further on the ground. We now have repeated inspections across several periods, dozens of documented planning cases, checks inside residential buildings, collaboration with Migración Colombia and fresh official guidance spelling out a long compliance checklist for short-term-rental operators.
Medellín has also placed tourist-home oversight inside a broader Tourism Security Plan covering the next several years. That suggests enforcement is being institutionalized instead of appearing only when Airbnb becomes politically controversial.
Bogotá gives us an important counterweight. Registered tourist homes are still growing there, so the evidence does not support a national campaign to eliminate Airbnb supply.
The more convincing forecast is stricter legal filtering. Properties that clearly satisfy tourism, building and planning rules should remain viable. Apartments depending on regulatory ambiguity have much more to worry about.
Get to know the market before buying a property in Colombia
Better information leads to better decisions. Get all the data you need before investing a large amount of money.
So, are Colombia’s Airbnb rules getting stricter?
Yes. Colombia’s Airbnb rules are clearly getting stricter today, especially in the way authorities verify whether a short-term rental is legal at the property level.
Airbnb itself remains legal, and thousands of registered tourist homes continue to operate. Bogotá’s latest data even show an 8.8% annual increase in registered viviendas turísticas, so there is no convincing evidence of a nationwide attempt to shut down the category.
The pressure is concentrated elsewhere. Colombia is making it harder for a host to rely on an RNT while ignoring the building’s regulations, land-use rules, licences, guest reporting or other tourism obligations.
Medellín is furthest along. Its authorities are repeatedly inspecting short-term rentals, checking residential buildings, comparing activities with planning permissions and working with Migración Colombia. The city’s newest guidance now lays out the compliance requirements in unusually direct terms.
National policy is moving in the same direction. MinCIT’s proposed RNT overhaul would make registrations easier to verify and connect information that currently sits across different public databases. Those provisions are still under reform rather than fully in force, so we should not jump ahead of the law.
For a Colombian property buyer, the practical consequence is already here. Before counting Airbnb income in an investment model, we would now verify the registered building rules, permitted land use, required property licences and active RNT separately.
Colombia still allows Airbnb. These days, the bigger question is whether the specific apartment you want to rent can survive a serious compliance check.
OUR METHODOLOGY
This analysis tests whether Colombia’s Airbnb rules are actually becoming stricter as of 31 August 2026. We separate new law from proposed reform, registration rules from property-level legality, and formalization from actual enforcement so that a draft decree is not treated the same way as a rule already in force.
We use Law 2068 of 2020, Decree 1836 of 2021, Decree 2590 of 2009 and Law 1558 of 2012 as the core legal baseline. These sources establish the existing RNT framework, the treatment of tourist housing, the role of digital platforms and the importance of propiedad-horizontal rules.
For the direction of national policy, we rely on MinCIT’s 2025 and 2026 draft-decree registers and the July 2026 RNT draft. We treat those documents as evidence of where regulation is moving, not as requirements already in force. The draft’s proposed verification, identity checks and interoperability with DIAN, municipalities, Migración Colombia and other public databases are therefore described as proposed changes.
For enforcement in practice, we give the most weight to municipal sources. Medellín’s official releases provide the inspection figures, planning cases, El Poblado enforcement activity, information exchanges with Migración Colombia, legal-operation checklist and the 2026–2030 Tourism Security Plan. Cartagena’s city government provides the clearest local example of enforcement against short-term rentals operating where the approved use remains residential.
Bogotá’s April 2026 RNT figures are used as an important counterweight. The city reported 14,264 active tourism providers, 7.1% annual growth and an 8.8% increase in registered tourist homes, which helps distinguish stricter compliance from a nationwide attempt to suppress legal short-term-rental supply.
We also use first-hand implementation guidance from Airbnb for the platform’s treatment of Colombia’s RNT requirement, Migración Colombia for SIRE, MinCIT’s Resolution 700 of 2021 for the Tarjeta de Registro de Alojamiento, DIAN for accommodation-related RUT activity and the Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio for consumer-protection obligations affecting accommodation providers.
Key sources include MinCIT’s 2026 draft-decree register, the July 2026 draft RNT decree, Law 2068 of 2020, Decree 1836 of 2021, Medellín’s May 2026 El Poblado enforcement release, Medellín’s current legal-operation guidance, Bogotá’s April 2026 RNT figures, Cartagena’s short-term-rental enforcement page, Airbnb’s responsible-hosting guidance for Colombia, and Migración Colombia’s SIRE guidance.
Buying real estate in Colombia can be risky
An increasing number of foreign investors are showing interest. However, 90% of them will make mistakes. Avoid the pitfalls with our comprehensive guide.
Related blog posts
- Can foreigners get a mortgage in Colombia?
- How much money do you need to retire in Colombia?
- Will property prices rise in Colombia?
- Are property prices in Colombia still rising?
