Summary
Usually not. Across Panama City, new flats list at US$251 per square foot against US$160 for real resale sales, a +56% premium. Santa Maria is the clearest exception at +32%, and Punta Pacifica sits at the other end at +123%.
The rent side makes that premium harder to defend. A typical new 2-bed in Panama City costs US$284K against US$181K for resale, yet it takes ~17 years of rent to pay back against ~12 years for a resale one.
The gap gets much harsher in the older tower districts. Marbella is also at +123%, Punta Paitilla at +119%, Bella Vista at +112% and San Francisco at +108%, all places where buyers can compare new launches with a deep pool of older apartments.
Santa Maria and Casco Viejo sit apart from that pattern. Santa Maria has the smallest premium in our table and few older towers, while Casco Viejo, at +37%, has restored buildings with tourism permits that an ordinary flat cannot copy.
The market has also turned more selective. New-home sales fell from 4,737 in 2024 to 2,866 in 2025, before 1,292 homes sold in the first quarter of 2026, according to 4S Real Estate figures presented through ACOBIR and reported by La Prensa. Developers answered with payment plans and financing rather than price cuts, which is why the big gaps with resale are still there today.
Policy now helps some cheaper new homes. Law 546 changed the transfer tax on qualifying first sales, and the preferential-interest regime and Abono Pa'Ti support the lower price bands; none of it does much for a new 2-bed in the prime districts.
Paying more for new does not remove the building risk either. Acodeco recorded 247 real-estate complaints in the first seven months of 2026, and lawmakers are still working on Bill 212, which would make developers more liable for defects and basic services.
So the answer is selective: new construction can earn its premium when it buys real scarcity or a special legal use, but in most Panama City neighborhoods today the resale flat next door is simply too much cheaper.
Our Panama City new-construction table by neighborhood
This table gives our verdict for each of the 19 Panama City neighborhoods we track, with the figures behind it for new-build prices, real resale prices and the extra paid for new construction.
It also compares typical 2-bed prices and how many years of rent each one costs, so you can see whether the extra for new buys a better income or just a higher entry price.
If you want real answers from the field about a specific home or street, ask a pro in Panama City for free.
| Neighborhood |
Verdict our short answer |
New-Build Price per sq ft, list priceiDistrict new-build level, adjusted with developer price lists (Vaca Group) and the neighborhood's standing. |
Resale Price per sq ft, real sale price |
Extra for New vs real resale priceiNew list price ÷ real resale price − 1. |
Price new 2-bed iNew list price × typical 2-bed size. |
Price resale 2-bed iReal sale price × typical 2-bed size. |
Price-to-Rent Ratio new, years of rent iNew 2-bed price ÷ (signed rent × 1.10 × 12). |
Price-to-Rent Ratio resale, years of rentiResale 2-bed price ÷ 12 months of signed rent. |
Why what drives the verdict here |
Data confidence iHigh: direct data for this neighborhood. Medium: one strong source, or several pointing the same way, with our own estimate. Low: few signals, an order of magnitude. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panama CityChecked Nov 2026 | No | 251 | 160 | +56% | 284K | 181K | ~17 years | ~12 years | New flats list at about $250 per sq ft citywide, about 55% more than resale flats really sell for. Rents for new units are only ~10% higher, so the extra rarely pays back. | High |
| Santa Maria | Sometimes | 362 | 274 | +32% | 468K | 354K | ~17 years | ~14 years | New here costs about 32% more than resale, one of the smallest gaps in town. Older towers are few, so new is often the only choice. Few resale flats come up here, and they go fast. | High |
| Casco Viejo | Sometimes | 427 | 311 | +37% | 391K | 285K | ~19 years | ~16 years | New here costs about 37% more than resale, one of the smallest gaps in town. Restored buildings with permits for short stays can justify part of it. | Medium |
| Amador | No | 409 | 218 | +87% | 418K | 223K | ~22 years | ~13 years | A new 2-bed lists at about 418K, against 223K for a resale one that rents for nearly the same. Resale wins unless you need the amenities. Most new supply here is towers sold off‑plan. | Medium |
| Costa del Este | No | 339 | 200 | +70% | 456K | 269K | ~21 years | ~14 years | A new 2-bed lists at about 456K, against 269K for a resale one that rents for nearly the same. Resale wins unless you need the amenities. | High |
| Avenida Balboa | No | 325 | 190 | +71% | 385K | 226K | ~20 years | ~13 years | A new 2-bed lists at about 385K, against 226K for a resale one that rents for nearly the same. Resale wins unless you need the amenities. | Medium |
| Punta Pacifica | No | 390 | 175 | +123% | 504K | 226K | ~24 years | ~12 years | A new 2-bed lists at about 504K, against 226K for a resale one that rents for nearly the same. That's double: resale is the better buy. Many owners bought to rent and are now selling. | High |
| Clayton | — | — | 175 | — | — | 188K | — | ~14 years | Few new projects and no published new‑build price for Clayton. Resale flats and houses here sell for about $175 per sq ft; compare those first. | Medium |
| Coco del Mar | No | 325 | 165 | +97% | 402K | 205K | ~20 years | ~11 years | A new 2-bed lists at about 402K, against 205K for a resale one that rents for nearly the same. That's double: resale is the better buy. Fewer towers than its neighbors, so less competition. | Medium |
| El Cangrejo | No | 279 | 165 | +69% | 315K | 187K | ~21 years | ~14 years | A new 2-bed lists at about 315K, against 187K for a resale one that rents for nearly the same. Resale wins unless you need the amenities. Renters line up here, which keeps landlords busy. | High |
| Marbella | No | 362 | 163 | +123% | 429K | 192K | ~22 years | ~11 years | A new 2-bed lists at about 429K, against 192K for a resale one that rents for nearly the same. That's double: resale is the better buy. Lots of stock, and many owners trying to sell at once. | Medium |
| Obarrio | No | 316 | 162 | +95% | 323K | 165K | ~21 years | ~12 years | A new 2-bed lists at about 323K, against 165K for a resale one that rents for nearly the same. That's double: resale is the better buy. Office workers keep small flats rented all year. | Medium |
| Albrook | — | — | 158 | — | — | 170K | — | ~13 years | We found no reliable new‑build price for Albrook alone. Resale flats sell for about $160 per sq ft and rent well to people working near the mall and Albrook airport. | Medium |
| San Francisco | No | 325 | 156 | +108% | 368K | 176K | ~25 years | ~13 years | A new 2-bed lists at about 368K, against 176K for a resale one that rents for nearly the same. That's double: resale is the better buy. Old towers here are big and cheap; new ones are not. | Medium |
| Bella Vista | No | 325 | 153 | +112% | 368K | 173K | ~23 years | ~12 years | A new 2-bed lists at about 368K, against 173K for a resale one that rents for nearly the same. That's double: resale is the better buy. Many older towers are for sale, so sellers compete. | High |
| Punta Paitilla | No | 325 | 149 | +119% | 420K | 192K | ~22 years | ~11 years | A new 2-bed lists at about 420K, against 192K for a resale one that rents for nearly the same. That's double: resale is the better buy. Big older flats with sea views, often needing work. | Medium |
| El Carmen | No | 279 | 144 | +94% | 285K | 147K | ~22 years | ~13 years | A new 2-bed lists at about 285K, against 147K for a resale one that rents for nearly the same. That's double: resale is the better buy. Few foreigners look here, so prices stay local. | Medium |
| Betania | No | 214 | 139 | +53% | 207K | 135K | ~19 years | ~14 years | A new 2-bed lists at about 207K, against 135K for a resale one that rents for nearly the same. Resale wins unless you need the amenities. Mostly Panamanian buyers, with few foreigners. | Medium |
| El Dorado | No | 214 | 139 | +53% | 207K | 135K | ~18 years | ~13 years | A new 2-bed lists at about 207K, against 135K for a resale one that rents for nearly the same. Resale wins unless you need the amenities. Buyers here are mostly local families, not investors. | Medium |
| Panama Viejo | No | 204 | 135 | +52% | 187K | 123K | ~18 years | ~13 years | A new 2-bed lists at about 187K, against 123K for a resale one that rents for nearly the same. Resale wins unless you need the amenities. | Medium |
New-home sales fell about 40% in 2025 (4,737 to 2,866) before a partial rebound in early 2026. Against asking resale prices rather than real sale prices, the extra for new is smaller, roughly 40-80%.
How we got these numbers. We used the 4S Real Estate / ACOBIR study published by La Prensa on 15 July 2026 (new list prices by district), ACOBIR MLS and Registro Público closings for resale, developer price lists and three rent studies: 50 signals from 18 sources. Neighborhoods inherit their district's new-build level, adjusted with project price lists.
Source: TheLatinvestor property database, November 2026.
Ask a Panama City pro to check
the developer, for free.
They know which developers deliver on time.
Message a proIs new construction worth paying more for in Panama City now?
No. New construction in Panama City usually costs too much above resale to make sense on the numbers alone: across the city, new flats list at US$251 per square foot against US$160 for real resale sales, a +56% gap.
A typical new 2-bed across the city costs US$284K against US$181K for resale, and the rent comparison leans the same way at ~17 years of rent for new against ~12 years for resale. A newer lobby, pool or kitchen is worth something, but the premium has to compete with a resale flat that is already much cheaper, before financing even enters the picture.
La Prensa reported in July 2026 that the 4S Real Estate study presented through ACOBIR put new apartments at US$4,626 per square meter in Santa Ana, US$3,782 in Bella Vista, US$3,723 in Juan Diaz and US$3,673 in San Francisco.
The same report gave much lower MLS closing prices for resale in the first half of 2026: US$2,587 per square meter in Juan Diaz, US$1,759 in San Francisco and US$1,405 in Bella Vista.
Those figures are per square meter and cover whole districts, wider than our neighborhoods, so they do not line up one-to-one with our per-square-foot prices. The direction is the same, though: developer prices sit far above what older flats really sell for.
Santa Maria and Casco Viejo are the only two neighborhoods where we say new can sometimes be worth it. Clayton and Albrook have no reliable new-build price of their own, and for the other 15 neighborhoods our answer is no.
Why does new construction look less overpriced in some Panama City listings?
Because Panama City resale asking prices make the extra for new look smaller than it is at closing.
Our table uses real resale sale prices, which is why the citywide +56% gap looks larger than a portal comparison. Against asking resale prices, the extra for new is smaller, roughly 40-80%. An asking price is what a seller hopes to get; a closing price is what a buyer really paid.
ACOBIR separates the two markets in its own reporting. Its material tracks presale supply, projects under construction and absorption on the new side, while MLS ACOBIR covers resale and rentals. La Prensa's July 2026 report put the 4S new prices next to MLS closing prices, a cleaner view of the gap than two sets of advertised listings.
The effect is strongest in the older tower districts. San Francisco carries a +108% premium in our table, Bella Vista +112% and Punta Paitilla +119%. A developer can discount a launch and still leave the buyer paying far above where older flats are closing nearby.
The table below shows five older tower neighborhoods where new flats list at much the same price, ranked by the extra for new, with what resale flats really sell for there.
| Neighborhood | Resale price per sq ft (real sale) | Extra for new | Resale 2-bed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Punta Paitilla | US$149 | +119% | US$192K |
| Bella Vista | US$153 | +112% | US$173K |
| San Francisco | US$156 | +108% | US$176K |
| Coco del Mar | US$165 | +97% | US$205K |
| Obarrio | US$162 | +95% | US$165K |
So when a sales brochure says the new unit is only a little above resale, the first thing to check is whether the resale figure is an asking price or a completed sale.
Did Panama City's weak 2025 new-home sales push developers to cut prices?
Not really. Panama City's new-home market weakened sharply in 2025, but developers chose to revive demand with financing and incentives rather than cut prime projects down to resale levels.
La Prensa reported 4,737 new homes sold in 2024 and 2,866 in 2025, from the 4S Real Estate study, then 1,292 homes in the first quarter of 2026. The report tied part of the slowdown to the end of the US$10,000 housing bonus, doubts about the preferential-interest regime and tighter credit, so the fall in sales was not simply buyers rejecting new-build prices.
The policy response came fast. A new preferential-interest framework took effect in 2026, and September 2026 coverage of Expo CAPAC described developers leaning on subsidies, bank financing and a large project pipeline to restart sales.
Foreign buyers also give developers another source of demand. La Prensa reported buyers from Colombia, Venezuela and the United States holding up property sales during the weaker market, with real estate dominating qualified-investor certificates in the government data it cited. That demand helps explain why expensive new projects keep selling without matching older closing prices.
The result shows in our table today: Costa del Este is at +70%, Avenida Balboa at +71% and Amador at +87%. The softer market gave buyers more room to negotiate, but it did not reset new-build prices.
Are Panama City developer incentives enough to close the gap with resale?
Usually no. Payment plans, subsidized loans and launch promotions make a Panama City new build easier to pay for, but they rarely close the price gap with resale.
A developer can help with timing by stretching deposits, arranging bank financing or adding a promotion to a launch phase. Those tools change when the money leaves your account, which helps when credit is tight, but the flat still has to compete with a resale unit on the day you sign.
That is easiest to see in the established neighborhoods. A new 2-bed costs US$456K in Costa del Este against US$269K for resale, US$385K in Avenida Balboa against US$226K, and US$418K in Amador against US$223K.
Coverage of the Expo CAPAC housing fair in September 2026 described developers relying on bank financing, subsidies and a large pipeline of projects to restart sales, with no talk of lower list prices.
A payment plan softens the timing; the resale price stays much lower. Incentives are a negotiation tool, not proof that a new unit has become competitive with resale.
Ask an agent who knows
Panama City, for free.
They know how much room sellers usually leave.
Message a proWhere is paying extra for new construction easiest to justify in Panama City?
Santa Maria and Casco Viejo are the two Panama City neighborhoods where paying extra for new is easiest to defend, and the only two where we say it is sometimes worth it.
Santa Maria has the smallest premium in our table at +32%. A typical new 2-bed costs US$468K against US$354K for resale, and a new flat there also has the lowest years-of-rent figure in our table.
Santa Maria was built later than Punta Paitilla, Marbella, Bella Vista and San Francisco, so buyers face far fewer older towers competing with the new projects. If you want Santa Maria specifically, the resale choice is thin.
Casco Viejo works for a different reason, at +37%: some restored buildings come with a legal tourism use that an ordinary flat elsewhere cannot offer. The next answers look at that case.
Neither place is cheap. Santa Maria has the highest resale 2-bed price in our table, so the premium there buys scarcity, not a bargain.
Why is new construction so hard to justify in Punta Pacifica and Marbella?
Because Punta Pacifica and Marbella pair very expensive new launches with deep resale markets: both carry the largest premium in our table at +123%.
Punta Pacifica is the sharper case. A typical new 2-bed costs US$504K, the highest new 2-bed price in our table, while a resale 2-bed costs US$226K. A new flat there takes ~24 years of rent to pay back, a resale one ~12 years.
Marbella's new 2-bed costs US$429K against US$192K for resale, with ~22 years of rent for new against ~11 years for resale.
Both neighborhoods had big high-rise markets long before the latest launches. Buyers get older flats with known layouts and building histories, and sellers compete with each other as well as with developers. In Marbella, many owners are trying to sell at once; Punta Pacifica has a large stock bought by investors to rent, and those flats come back on the market when landlords leave.
New towers can still charge for newer systems, pools, gyms and finishes. But older units often give much more space for the money, so the premium is a lifestyle choice long before it is an income decision.
Do new Panama City apartments earn enough extra rent to cover the premium?
No. New apartments in Panama City do not earn enough extra rent to cover what buyers pay upfront, and that is one of the clearest reasons resale wins so often in our table.
San Francisco is the extreme case: a new flat takes ~25 years of rent to pay back against ~13 years for resale, the highest figure for new in our table. Coco del Mar is ~20 years for new but ~11 years for resale, the lowest resale figure in our table.
Rents for new flats are only about 10% higher across the city. Newer common areas and fewer repairs make a unit easier to rent, but tenants pay for the flat they live in each month, not for the developer's premium.
The table below ranks eight neighborhoods by how many years of rent a new 2-bed needs, next to a resale 2-bed in the same place.
| Neighborhood | New 2-bed | Resale 2-bed | Years of rent, new | Years of rent, resale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| San Francisco | US$368K | US$176K | ~25 years | ~13 years |
| Punta Pacifica | US$504K | US$226K | ~24 years | ~12 years |
| Bella Vista | US$368K | US$173K | ~23 years | ~12 years |
| Marbella | US$429K | US$192K | ~22 years | ~11 years |
| Amador | US$418K | US$223K | ~22 years | ~13 years |
| Coco del Mar | US$402K | US$205K | ~20 years | ~11 years |
| Casco Viejo | US$391K | US$285K | ~19 years | ~16 years |
| Santa Maria | US$468K | US$354K | ~17 years | ~14 years |
Financing widens the gap. A higher purchase price means a bigger loan, and the rent does not rise with it.
Can Casco Viejo justify a new-build premium because of short stays?
Sometimes. Casco Viejo can justify a higher price for a new or restored flat when the property has a legal tourism use that a normal Panama City condo cannot offer.
Our table gives Casco Viejo a +37% premium for new construction, one of the two smallest gaps in the city. A new 2-bed costs US$391K against US$285K for resale, and a new flat takes ~19 years of rent to pay back against ~16 years for resale. Casco Viejo also has the highest new-build and resale prices per square foot in our table, so buyers pay for a scarce historic location as much as for the condition of the property.
The Autoridad de Turismo de Panama keeps a national register of public tourist lodging and requires formal documents for each establishment; its registry was updated in October 2026. A restored building that is properly set up and authorized for tourist lodging can run very differently from an ordinary flat.
A sales pitch about Airbnb potential is not enough. The permit has to cover the actual property and activity, which is why some restored Casco Viejo buildings can justify a premium while an ordinary flat with no special use cannot.
Casco Viejo also stretches the word "new." Buyers are often comparing a fully restored historic building with older resale stock, not one glass tower with another.
Ask an agent who knows
Panama City, for free.
They know what similar homes really sold for.
Message a proWill Law 546 make new construction in Panama City worth more?
Only at the cheaper end. Law 546 cuts a cost on qualifying first sales of new homes, but most Panama City premiums are too large for the tax change to alter our verdict.
The law was enacted on August 31, 2026 and changes the real-estate transfer tax on the first sale of a new home. The official Gazette text exempts the first B/.120,000 of the taxable base when the sale is signed within the required period after the occupancy permit, with preferential rates above that up to B/.200,000. The law also bars contracts from shifting to the buyer a transfer tax that legally belongs to the seller.
Panama Viejo has the lowest new 2-bed price in our table at US$187K, so a typical flat there is much closer to the part of the market where the new rules can matter, if the sale qualifies. Betania and El Dorado are both at US$207K for a new 2-bed. Avenida Balboa is at US$385K, Costa del Este at US$456K and Punta Pacifica at US$504K.
Law 546 lowers one transaction cost for qualifying buyers; it does not bring a developer's asking price down to a resale closing.
Is an off-plan Panama City apartment safer than buying resale?
No. An off-plan Panama City apartment removes some of the repair surprises of an older building, but it adds developer, delivery, title and defect risks that a lived-in resale building has already started to reveal.
La Estrella reported from Acodeco records that 247 complaints against real-estate businesses were filed from January through July 2026, for US$10.6 million, with refunds, warranty failures and hidden defects behind nearly 80% of the formal complaints. La Prensa reported 405 real-estate complaints worth US$13.9 million for 2025. Defects, refunds and contract problems are a current issue, not a leftover from an old cycle.
Panama's National Assembly said Bill 212 had finished its subcommittee consultation in September 2026. The bill would make developers, builders and others more liable in residential projects, cover hidden defects and structural damage, and tie construction permits to verifiable basic services such as water, electricity, access roads and sewerage. It is still being processed, so those protections are not law yet.
Amador shows the risk on the development side. La Prensa's 2026 investigation into Naos Harbour described owners caught in a long dispute over the concession, debts, title delivery and seized units, with a third tower unfinished. The case is unusually complex, but it shows that a higher new-build price does not buy a simpler legal path.
Can a new Panama City apartment keep its developer price once it becomes resale?
Often no. A new Panama City apartment becomes a resale flat as soon as its first buyer owns it, and from then on it competes with older units, recently delivered ones and whatever the developer still has to sell.
So the gap between new and resale matters beyond the day you buy. You may pay for a brand-new unit because the finishes and payment plan are attractive, but the next buyer compares your flat with everything else in the neighborhood.
Punta Pacifica makes the risk obvious: new flats list at US$390 per square foot there against US$175 for real resale sales. Marbella is at US$362 against US$163, and Bella Vista at US$325 against US$153. The first owner enjoys a new building; the resale market does not promise to keep the developer's spread.
Foreign demand can slow that slide by keeping buyers interested in newer towers, and Panama's dollar economy makes the city easy to sell abroad. Still, foreign buyers shop resale too, and the next sale is judged against older flats.
If you may sell again within a few years, the current resale gap deserves as much attention as the launch price.
Are cheaper Panama City neighborhoods a better place to pay for new construction?
Not automatically. Cheaper Panama City neighborhoods lower the total cost of a new flat, but our data still shows a real premium over resale and a weaker rent case than the older flat next door.
Panama Viejo has the lowest new-build price in our table at US$204 per square foot, with a US$187K new 2-bed against a US$123K resale one. The premium is +52%, and a new flat takes ~18 years of rent to pay back against ~13 years for resale. Betania and El Dorado both have new 2-beds at US$207K and resale ones at US$135K, a +53% premium each.
The table below shows the five neighborhoods with the cheapest new flats per square foot, with the extra for new and the years of rent on each side.
| Neighborhood | New-build price per sq ft (list) | Extra for new | Years of rent, new | Years of rent, resale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panama Viejo | US$204 | +52% | ~18 years | ~13 years |
| Betania | US$214 | +53% | ~19 years | ~14 years |
| El Dorado | US$214 | +53% | ~18 years | ~13 years |
| El Cangrejo | US$279 | +69% | ~21 years | ~14 years |
| El Carmen | US$279 | +94% | ~22 years | ~13 years |
Public support is stronger here than in the luxury districts. The 2026 preferential-interest regime focuses on lower price bands, and Abono Pa'Ti adds a US$3,000 down-payment subsidy for qualifying new homes up to US$80,000.
La Prensa reported in September 2026 that 81% of sales nationally were homes up to US$120,000. Even the cheapest new 2-beds in our Panama City table sit well above that, so they mostly miss the strongest support.
A lower total price helps, but resale still wins in Panama Viejo, Betania and El Dorado unless you put a high value on new systems, warranties and amenities.
So, is new construction worth paying more for in Panama City now?
Usually not. New construction in Panama City is worth paying extra for only when the premium buys something genuinely scarce, and that happens in a small part of our table.
Across the city our answer is no, and it is no for 15 of the 19 neighborhoods we track. Santa Maria and Casco Viejo are the only places where new is sometimes worth it, while Clayton and Albrook have no reliable new-build price of their own.
The core problem is entry price against rent. New flats rent a little better, but the purchase premium is far larger, especially in older districts such as San Francisco, Bella Vista, Punta Paitilla, Marbella and Punta Pacifica, where older towers give buyers plenty of choice.
Santa Maria is the strongest exception because its resale choice is thin and its premium is the smallest in our table. Casco Viejo is the other one because the property itself can be different: a properly authorized restored building can combine heritage scarcity with a tourism use that an ordinary resale flat cannot copy.
The 2026 policy changes help new homes without overturning that comparison. Cheaper loans, the transfer-tax cut and the down-payment subsidy reduce costs for qualifying purchases in the lower price bands, while new 2-beds in the prime districts stay far above the resale alternatives.
Paying more for new does not guarantee a smoother purchase either. Acodeco's complaint figures keep defects, refunds, delivery and basic services in the news, while a finished resale building has a track record you can inspect.
Our default today is to start with resale and make the new project earn its premium. Santa Maria, some restored Casco Viejo buildings and a few cheaper qualifying homes can pass that test. Most Panama City neighborhoods do not.
What to watch next: the next 4S Real Estate sales count through ACOBIR, to see whether the early-2026 rebound holds; whether developers start cutting list prices rather than offering payment plans; and the final vote on Bill 212.
How solid is this? Our gaps rest on developer list prices against real resale closings, with high confidence citywide and in Santa Maria, Punta Pacifica, Costa del Este, El Cangrejo and Bella Vista, and medium confidence in the other neighborhoods, which start from their district's level. What could change the picture is a real wave of developer price cuts, which we do not see yet.
Our methodology
Our data runs through November 2026. We compare new-build list prices with real resale sale prices, typical 2-bed prices and years of rent across 19 Panama City neighborhoods, then give each neighborhood a simple verdict on whether the extra paid for new construction is justified by what the buyer gets.
We used the 4S Real Estate / ACOBIR study published by La Prensa on July 15, 2026 for new list prices by district, ACOBIR MLS and Registro Publico closings for resale, developer price lists for individual projects, and three rent studies: 186 signals from 45 websites. Neighborhoods inherit their district's new-build level, adjusted with project price lists.
High confidence means strong sources agree. Medium confidence means one strong source, or several sources pointing the same way, with our neighborhood estimate built from the figure for Panama City and what we know of each neighborhood. Cells we could not estimate well are left empty.
Prices in our table are in US dollars, the currency Panama's housing market uses, so no exchange rate is involved.
New and resale prices come from different parts of the market. New flats are sold from a developer price list, while our resale benchmark uses real sales; we chose that comparison because the buyer's real alternative to a new unit is what an older unit closes for, not what its owner advertises online.
The first objection is that a new flat has better finishes, newer systems, fewer repairs and amenities an older building cannot match. We weigh that in the verdict rather than treating it as worthless: Santa Maria and Casco Viejo get a "sometimes" because their premium is smaller and the new or restored flat is harder to replace with an equivalent resale one.
Key sources used for this analysis include 4S Real Estate and ACOBIR data on 2025 new-home sales, the 2026 rebound and new-versus-resale prices, ACOBIR description of its primary, secondary and rental market reports, ACOBIR presentation of first-half 2026 MLS and 4S market results, Official publication of Law 546 of August 31, 2026, Full official text of Law 546 and the transfer-tax treatment for qualifying first sales, Official decree regulating the 2026 preferential-interest regime, Official text of Law 468 and preferential mortgage bands, Explanation of the 2026 preferential mortgage regime, Abono Pa'Ti and the combination of 2026 housing incentives, 2026 inventory, Expo CAPAC and housing-demand mix, Status of Bill 212 after the subcommittee consultation process, Bill 212 provisions on developer responsibility, defects and basic services, Acodeco complaint totals and main causes in the first seven months of 2026, Acodeco real-estate complaint totals for 2025, Naos Harbour ownership, title and concession dispute in Amador, Foreign-buyer demand and qualified-investor real-estate certificates, ATP public tourist lodging registry and October 2026 update, ATP documentation and registration requirements for tourist lodging, Superintendencia de Bancos interest-rate reporting, including mortgage references, INEC construction census for Panama and San Miguelito and INEC construction-material price index updates through September 2026.
Spotted an error? Tell us, we fix it within days.