Is Bogotá cracking down on Airbnb?

Get all the data you need about the real estate market in Bogotá

Why is Bogotá suddenly so worried about Airbnb?

Bogotá is paying much more attention to Airbnb because short-term rentals have become large enough to affect tourism, apartment buildings and parts of the housing market at the same time.

The scale has changed dramatically. During a Bogotá City Council debate, Councillor Quena Ribadeneira cited roughly 500 tourist accommodations in 2015 versus more than 8,600 registered tourist homes in 2025. By April 2026, Bogotá had 14,264 active tourism providers in the Registro Nacional de Turismo, with tourist homes adding another 689 registrations in one year, according to the Instituto Distrital de Turismo.

The political conversation has changed with that growth. Bogotá officials are now discussing rents, neighborhood coexistence, security, tax treatment and whether some new apartment projects are being built mainly for short stays. A few years ago, the focus was much more on registering tourism businesses properly.

Airbnb has become a housing question as well as a tourism question in Bogotá. That is why tougher controls are now being discussed even while the formal market keeps expanding.

Is Airbnb already heavily regulated in Bogotá?

Yes. Running an Airbnb in Bogotá already comes with several legal requirements, even before any new crackdown happens.

Tourist accommodation providers generally need an active Registro Nacional de Turismo, or RNT. The registration has to be renewed, and Airbnb tells Colombian hosts that the RNT number must appear on the listing.

Hosts also have guest-reporting duties. Tourist accommodation providers use Colombia's accommodation-registration system, while foreign visitors create additional reporting obligations linked to migration authorities.

Apartments inside propiedad horizontal buildings face another major restriction. Tourist accommodation has to fit the building's registered rules. Buying an apartment does not automatically give the owner permission to run short stays.

Colombia's tourism authorities can also investigate and sanction providers operating outside the rules. So a Bogotá Airbnb already sits inside a fairly dense legal framework.

Can a Bogotá apartment building ban Airbnb?

Yes. A condominium building in Bogotá can effectively stop Airbnb use when its propiedad horizontal rules do not authorize tourist accommodation.

Colombia's Council of State has upheld the role of condominium regulations in deciding whether apartments can be used for tourism. Owners who want short-term rentals may need the owners' assembly to approve a change to those rules.

This makes the building itself one of the biggest practical risks for Airbnb investors in Bogotá. Two apartments a block apart can have completely different short-term-rental prospects because their condominium documents are different.

Building administrators also have responsibilities when tourist accommodation operates without the required authorization. In practice, an Airbnb can run into trouble long before Bogotá creates any citywide restriction.

For anyone buying specifically for short stays, checking the building rules matters just as much as checking the neighborhood or expected nightly rate.

Has Bogotá actually banned Airbnb anywhere?

No. Bogotá currently has no broad citywide Airbnb ban comparable with the policies adopted in some heavily regulated European cities.

Bogotá has discussed tighter controls, and the Instituto Distrital de Turismo has studied issues including taxation, neighborhood coexistence, housing pressure and stronger formalization. City councillors have also pushed the housing impact higher up the political agenda.

Those discussions have not produced a citywide cap or a general rule eliminating short-term rentals from residential neighborhoods.

So when people say Bogotá is “cracking down,” the distinction is important. Regulation is getting more serious, while Airbnb remains legal when the host, property and building meet the applicable requirements.

Are Bogotá authorities actually shutting down lots of illegal Airbnbs?

We do not see evidence of a large, sustained wave of Airbnb closures across Bogotá today.

Authorities have the legal tools to sanction unregistered tourism providers, and condominium rules can also force unauthorized short-term rentals to stop. What is missing is public evidence showing thousands of units being removed through a coordinated enforcement campaign.

The market data point the same way. Active listings remain high, new hosts are still entering in some datasets, and official tourist-home registrations continue to rise.

A serious enforcement campaign would eventually leave a measurable mark: fewer listings, fewer registrations, a large volume of sanctions or repeated reports of buildings being forced out of the short-term-rental market. We are not seeing that at scale yet.

For now, enforcement looks selective and incomplete.

Is Bogotá registering Airbnbs faster than it is removing them?

Yes. The official numbers currently show a growing formal short-term-rental sector in Bogotá.

Bogotá counted 8,650 registered tourist homes in its consolidated 2025 figures. By April 2026, the category had added 689 active registrations compared with the same period a year earlier, an 8.8% increase.

All tourism providers with an active RNT reached 14,264 at the same point, up 7.1% year over year. Tourist homes were one of the main reasons the total increased.

Those numbers do not prove every registered property is fully compliant with every building or local rule. They do show that formal tourist accommodation is still expanding.

For now, Bogotá looks more successful at pulling short-term rentals into the formal tourism system than at reducing their overall number.

How big is Airbnb in Bogotá today?

Airbnb is now a five-figure market in Bogotá, large enough that small differences between datasets do not change the basic picture.

Inside Airbnb counted 19,187 Airbnb listings in its June 2026 scrape, including 15,863 classified as short-term rentals. AirDNA counted 14,108 active short-term rentals the following month.

Those numbers differ because the companies use different definitions. A listing captured online is different from a listing considered recently active, and neither figure can be matched directly to an RNT registration.

Still, we are clearly talking about tens of thousands of online listings or active units across the wider short-term-rental ecosystem, rather than a small side market.

Inside Airbnb also counted 13,865 entire-home listings. That is especially relevant for the housing debate because entire apartments can compete much more directly with long-term housing than spare-room rentals do.

Is Airbnb supply in Bogotá finally falling?

There is now evidence that active supply may be falling, but the answer depends heavily on which dataset we use.

AirDNA's current Bogotá page still reports 14,108 active rentals for July 2026, but it now labels that figure as down 34.4% year over year. That is a meaningful reversal and we should not describe AirDNA as showing continued 2026 supply growth.

Other measures point to a market that had been expanding quickly before that pullback. Airbtics estimated that Bogotá added around 3,180 Airbnb listings during 2025, while Inside Airbnb still found new hosts entering in June 2026. Official tourist-home RNT registrations were also up year over year by April.

The datasets are not directly comparable, so the cleanest reading is that Bogotá remains a very large short-term-rental market, but active commercial supply may be entering a shakeout after a period of rapid expansion.

That is more interesting than a simple “still growing” story. It may be the first place to look for evidence that tougher compliance, competition or weaker economics are starting to bite.

Is Chapinero where Bogotá could crack down first?

Chapinero is the obvious place to watch because Airbnb is far more concentrated there than across Bogotá as a whole.

Inside Airbnb counted 5,097 listings in Chapinero in June 2026. That represented roughly 26.6% of all Bogotá listings in the dataset. Usaquén and Teusaquillo also had large concentrations, though Chapinero was clearly ahead.

This concentration changes the housing discussion. Airbnb may represent a small share of Bogotá's total housing stock while still having a much larger local effect in a few neighborhoods filled with tourists, furnished apartments and investment properties.

The Instituto Distrital de Turismo has previously highlighted areas such as Chapinero and Usaquén when discussing gentrification and pressure linked to tourist accommodation.

If Bogotá eventually moves toward neighborhood-specific restrictions, Chapinero is the most logical place to start. A citywide ban would hit a huge and diverse metropolis; targeted rules could focus on the streets where short-term rentals are actually concentrated.

Is Airbnb actually making Bogotá's housing problem worse?

Yes, especially in high-Airbnb neighborhoods, although Bogotá's broader housing problem is much bigger than short-term rentals.

DANE found that 57.4% of Bogotá households lived in rented or sublet homes in 2025, while 36.3% lived in homes they owned. Housing access is already difficult in a city where demand for well-located homes has grown faster than affordable supply.

The District has estimated that between 2014 and 2024 roughly 70,745 new households formed each year while only around 35,511 housing units were initiated annually. That gap is far too large to explain with Airbnb alone.

The local picture is different. Inside Airbnb found more than 13,800 entire-home listings across Bogotá, and thousands are concentrated in Chapinero and other central districts. Apartments used permanently for short stays are unavailable to ordinary long-term tenants.

Airbnb is therefore likely adding real rental pressure in specific neighborhoods without being the main cause of Bogotá's citywide affordability problem.

Is 40% of Bogotá's new housing really becoming Airbnb?

We would not treat the claim that 40% of new Bogotá housing is going to short-term rentals as a proven citywide fact.

Councillor Quena Ribadeneira raised the figure during a City Council debate, saying that roughly four out of ten new homes under construction could be aimed at short-rental models.

That is an extraordinary number if applied across the entire city. It is more plausible as a description of specific projects, investor-heavy developments or pockets of Bogotá where small furnished apartments are being marketed heavily to short-stay buyers.

There is still a real trend underneath the controversy. Bogotá has thousands of entire-home Airbnb listings, multi-listing operators control a large share of supply, and the City Council is openly discussing whether new housing is being diverted toward tourism.

The safer conclusion is specific: short-term rentals are influencing some new residential development in Bogotá, while the 40% figure is too uncertain to use as a citywide benchmark.

Are Bogotá Airbnbs mostly regular people renting their spare apartment?

No. A large share of Bogotá's Airbnb market is run by multi-listing hosts and professional managers.

Inside Airbnb found that 13,226 listings, or 68.9% of the Bogotá total, belonged to hosts with more than one listing. The largest host in the dataset controlled 166 listings.

Entire homes made up 72.3% of all listings. Put those two facts together and the market looks much more commercial than the old image of somebody renting out a spare bedroom.

There is an important caveat: a host managing 30 listings may be a property-management company representing 30 different owners. The dataset cannot tell us that one person owns all 30 units.

Even with that caveat, Bogotá Airbnb clearly has a professional layer large enough to matter. Those operators are also easier enforcement targets because dozens of units can be checked through one management company or account.

Do enough tourists use Airbnb for Bogotá to think twice about restricting it?

Yes. Tourist homes are now an important part of Bogotá's accommodation market, especially for international visitors staying several nights.

Bogotá's traveler research found that 20% of foreign tourists using paid accommodation stayed in tourist homes such as Airbnb in 2024. Hotels were still ahead at 38.4%, but a one-in-five share is substantial.

Among international tourists staying in tourist homes, 63.2% spent four to seven nights there. Apartments work particularly well for that type of trip because travelers get more space, kitchens and a residential location.

Bogotá also continues to attract large numbers of foreign visitors. The city received 751,969 international visitors in the first five months of 2026, according to District tourism data.

That makes aggressive restrictions harder politically. Bogotá wants more tourism, and short-term rentals already provide a meaningful chunk of visitor accommodation. Any tougher policy has to deal with that demand somewhere.

Is Colombia about to make Airbnb rules much stricter?

Colombia is actively working on tighter digital enforcement, and the newest regulatory effort could make Airbnb compliance much easier for authorities to verify.

MinCIT published another draft decree in July 2026 covering the Registro Nacional de Turismo and the obligations of digital tourism platforms. The proposal follows earlier consultations and focuses heavily on better verification, cleaner RNT data and stronger interoperability between government databases.

The technical direction is important. MinCIT has said it wants the RNT to exchange information more effectively with entities such as DIAN, Migración Colombia, chambers of commerce and territorial authorities. Better database links would make false, inconsistent or outdated registrations easier to detect.

MinCIT has also been explicit about its objective: every accommodation provider should follow clear formal rules regardless of whether the booking comes through Airbnb, another platform or a different channel.

Previous tourism bills that attracted attention in 2025 and early 2026 were archived, so their proposed rules should not be presented as if they were coming into force. The current draft-decree process is the fresher development to watch.

If the government turns registration into a system that automatically checks several databases, illegal listings become much easier to find without sending inspectors door to door.

Does the growing number of registered Airbnbs mean Bogotá has lost control?

No. Rising registrations actually show that more short-term rentals are entering Bogotá's formal tourism system.

Bogotá recorded 8,650 tourist-home registrations in 2025, and the category added another 689 active registrations by April 2026 compared with the previous year. Authorities can identify and supervise registered operators far more easily than completely informal ones.

The unresolved issue is the size of the online market around that formal system. Inside Airbnb classified 15,863 Bogotá listings as short-term rentals, while AirDNA counted 14,108 active units using its own methodology.

We cannot subtract the RNT total directly from either platform number and call the difference “illegal.” Different dates, definitions, duplicate channels and operator structures make that calculation unreliable.

Still, the gap in scale explains why Bogotá and the national government want stronger verification. Registration is already widespread; connecting each real property, listing, building permission and operator more reliably is the harder part.

Is Bogotá starting to treat Airbnb as a housing problem?

Yes. Bogotá's Airbnb debate has clearly moved beyond tourism registration and into housing policy.

The City Council has connected short-term rentals with rent pressure, investor-oriented developments and the loss of residential units in some neighborhoods. The Instituto Distrital de Turismo has also discussed gentrification and coexistence alongside the usual tourism questions.

That shift widens the range of policies Bogotá could eventually consider. The city could target highly concentrated neighborhoods, professional operators, specific building types or developments designed around transient stays.

For now, the strongest actions still come from existing tourism rules and condominium authorization rather than a new housing restriction.

The political direction is pretty clear: once thousands of entire apartments are discussed as part of the housing supply, Airbnb faces a tougher policy debate than when it is treated only as another booking channel.

What would a real Airbnb crackdown in Bogotá look like?

A real Bogotá Airbnb crackdown would start showing up in listing numbers, enforcement data and the ability of illegal properties to stay online.

The most powerful change would be automatic verification. If Airbnb listings could be checked against the RNT, property details, territorial information and other official databases, authorities could identify questionable registrations at scale.

Concentrated enforcement would be another clear sign. Chapinero, Usaquén and Teusaquillo contain enough short-term-rental supply that systematic inspections or building-level checks there could affect thousands of listings.

Actual supply restrictions would go further: geographic caps, limits on tourist units in particular buildings, tighter land-use rules or restrictions aimed at professional portfolios.

Then the market should react. Active listings would decline, new-host formation would slow and reports of suspensions or sanctions would become common.

Those effects are still limited today, which gives us a useful benchmark for judging future announcements.

So, is Bogotá cracking down on Airbnb?

Partly. Bogotá is getting tougher on Airbnb, but the evidence still falls short of a full crackdown.

The pressure is real. Hosts already face RNT requirements, guest-reporting duties and building restrictions. Bogotá politicians are talking much more openly about housing pressure, and MinCIT is working on a stronger RNT and platform-verification framework.

The market is still large. Tourist-home registrations rose 8.8% year over year by April 2026, AirDNA counted more than 14,000 active rentals in July, and Inside Airbnb captured more than 19,000 total listings in June. At the same time, AirDNA now reports active supply down sharply year over year, so there may already be some market cooling.

The clearest reading is that Bogotá is tightening the net around non-compliant short-term rentals while continuing to tolerate a large legal Airbnb market.

The risk is highest for apartments whose building rules do not allow tourist use, hosts with weak or inconsistent registration, and professional operators concentrated in neighborhoods such as Chapinero. Compliant properties remain part of a major tourism market for now.

The actual crackdown begins when stricter rules remove a meaningful number of listings. Bogotá is not there yet.

Who is the author of this content?

THE LATINVESTOR

A team specialized in real estate investing in LATAM countries

We are a team of financial experts, legal professionals, developers, and local real estate specialists dedicated to helping people like you avoid mistakes when investing in real estate in a foreign place, particularly in Bogotá. If you’d like to learn more about us, you can check our presentation page.